Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Engineering Controls for Reducing Indoor
Concentrations of Bioaerosols
  • Jennifer Jeffers, University of Notre Dame
  • Professors Shelly L. Miller and Mark Hernandez


  • University of Colorado at Boulder


  • August 6, 2004
2
Introduction
  • Bioaerosols, aerosols containing particles of biological origin, can cause infectious diseases and are of concern in dealing with indoor air pollution and bioterrorism.


  • Air filters have been designed to remove and inactivate particles, including bioaerosols, from indoor air.


  • Ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI) is one possible method of controlling contamination in rooms and in buildings’ heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems by inactivating the bioaerosols.
3
Engineering Controls
  • Two methods of engineering controls were used:
  • In-room air filtration
  • Ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI)
  • Three parts of project:
  • Air filters
  • Upper-room UVGI
  • In-duct UVGI


4
Microorganisms Used
  • Parts 1 and 2: Aspergillus versicolor, fungus, size: 5-7µm, spores can be used as subpathogenic surrogates
  • Part 3: Mycobacterium parafortuitum, bacteria, size: 1µm, has a structure and environmental sensitivity similar to the bacteria that causes tuberculoses
5
Protocols
6
Part 1- Air Filters
  • Objective: determine the effectiveness of air filters at removing and inactivating Aspergillus versicolor
  • Two types of air filters were used- Ionic Breeze (commercially available) and Jaguar (prototype) both containing UV-C lamps
  • Ionic Breeze claims to have a clean-air delivery rate (CADR) of 46 m3/h, weighs 4.8 kg and costs $500
  • Jaguar claims to have a CADR of 425 m3/h, weighs 12 kg and has no associated cost
7
The Air Filters
8
Configuration of Test Chamber for Part 1
9
Part 1 Methods
  • Aspergillus versicolor was aerosolized for 75 minutes and 6 samples were collected at 30 minute intervals for 90 minutes following the aerosolization (2 samples per time period).
  • Each air sample was plated on 3 Petri dishes of malt extract agar and incubated for 7 days at 24şC
  • The plates were then counted to determine the number of colony forming units (CFU), those that are able to reproduce
10
Experimental Scenarios
11
Part 1 Results
12
Part 2- Upper-room UVGI
  • Objective: to determine the effectiveness of upper-room UVGI on inactivating Aspergillus versicolor
  • 5 UVGI lamps located in the room were used: 4 in each corner and one in the center of the ceiling
  • Corner lamps: 36 W each
  • Center lamp: 72 W
13
Test Chamber and UV lights
14
Test Chamber Configuration for Part 2
15
Part 2 Methods
  • Aspergillus versicolor was aerosolized for 75 minutes and 6 samples were collected at 30 minute intervals for 90 minutes following the aerosolization (2 samples per time period).
  • Each air sample was plated on 3 Petri dishes of malt extract agar and incubated for 7 days at 24şC
  • The plates were then counted to determine the number of colony forming units (CFU), those that are able to reproduce


16
Part 2 Results
17
Part 3- In-duct UVGI
  • Objective: determine the effectiveness of in-duct UVGI on inactivating Mycobacterium parafortuitum aerosolized from the outdoor air intake of the HVAC system
  • Three sampling locations: outdoor air duct, supply air duct and in the room with 2 BioSamplers in each location
  • Three UV lamps 20 inches in length were placed in the supply air duct 12 inches apart
  • UV intensity- 5 inches from the bottom of the duct: 1.50 µW/cm2 (StDev. 0.20) and 19 inches from the bottom of the duct: 1.13 µW/cm2 (StDev. 0.11)
  • Distance from UV lamps to supply air duct BioSamplers was 3.8 m
18
Test Chamber Configuration for Part 3
19
Protocols for Part 3
  • Velocities of the air in the ductwork were calibrated to achieve velocities consistent with typical air flows and isokinetic air sampling.
  • 100% outdoor air was used
  • Isokinetic (“equal-velocity”) Sampling:
  • nozzle tip opening (An) and sampling flow rate (Qm) must be adjusted to obtain a velocity vn=Qm/An equal to the gas stream velocity (vs) at the point of sampling
  • Shrouds were made for the BioSamplers using these calculations
20
Ductwork
21
Experimental Scenarios
22
Part 3 Methods
  • Mycobacterium parafortuitum was aerosolized from the outdoor air intake for 90 minutes and the air samples were collected at the 3 locations during the last 30 minutes of aerosolization
  • The samples were plated on trypic soy agar Petri dishes and incubated for 2-3 days at 38°C
  • The plates were then counted to determine the CFU concentration
  • Microscope slides made with DAPI stain were used to determine the total number of bacteria (live and dead)


23
Part 3 Results- 440 ft/min
24
Part 3 Results- 1000 ft/min
25
Conclusions
  • Part 1: The Jaguar prototype was more effective at inactivating A. versicolor than the Ionic Breeze, even though in a 89 m3 room, neither air filter was as effective as the manufacturer claimed
  • Part 2: Upper-room UVGI can inactivate A. versicolor in a 89 m3 room, but not at the same rate as bacteria
  • Part 3: In-duct UVGI is effective at inactivating M. parafortuitum at low air velocities, while it is not effective at high air velocities.
26
Acknowledgements
  • Elmira Kujundzic for helping design and run the in-room and in-duct experiments and with all the data analysis
  • Fatimah Matalkah for teaching me all the necessary lab techniques and letting me participate in her air filter study
  • Cody Howard for helping run all the experiments in the test chamber
  • Professors Shelly Miller and Mark Hernandez for the opportunity to work on this project
27
Questions?